Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best On Travel Network, Inc
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splashtalk 01:48, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Best On Travel Network, Inc
Sounds like advertising to me. Originally contained links to various services offered by the company, but they were removed by the author with the prod tag. Fightindaman 17:45, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- The entry has been updated to conform to the Wikipedia standards.I used the Wikipedia entry of Hotels.com, Travel Dynamics International & TripAdvisor--among others--as points of reference. Hopefully these changes will satisfy Wikipedia, as well as, it's vigilant users. --Neuralstate 18:57, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- Comment:But this still doesn't demonstrate that it's notable. Bestonbahamas.com has an Alexa ranking of 490,365 (vs. Hotels.com at 792). Fightindaman 19:08, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- Comment:And Travel Dynamics International has an Alexa rating of 808,354 vs Carnival Cruise Lines of 5,434. So what's your point?
- Comment:808,354 doesn't sound notable enough for a page either, but that does nothing to demonstrate the notability of this company. Fightindaman 19:22, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- Comment:Actually it does. It demonstrates that your initial use of Alexa as a measurement of relevance and notability for entries within Wikipedia is flawed. Furthermore, it demonstrates that even an apples to apples comparisons of websites--which your comparison was not— should not be the standard bearer for admittance or deletion in Wikipedia.--Neuralstate 19:34, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Does not appear to meet WP:CORP. Vegaswikian 00:27, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:CORP. Stifle 01:10, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.