Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bertie Stephens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --- Deville (Talk) 03:30, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bertie Stephens

ATTENTION! If you came here because somebody asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a ballot, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting heads. You can participate and give your opinion. Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing! Note: Comments made by suspected single purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username|UTC timestamp [optional]}}

NN person, fails WP:BIO. Sparse IMDB entry of little note, and not impressive number of ghits, many of which are not for this person. FYI: this may be part of a walled garden, see the AfD on Daniel M. Shirley and others. Agent 86 22:39, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - Blood red sandman 23:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep All Says not an impressive number of ghits, many of which are not for this person. Well i Know of Bertie and searched finding bar 1 every result was related to him for first few pages. He's not just a filmaker which is probably the confusion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.43.72.117 (talk • contribs).
• Keep All As above (bar knowing him), plus it seems bio appears on more than Imdb as listed for deletion —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.168.6.78 (talk • contribs).
• Keep All Not quite sure how this is against the rules as I found the infomation on the internet and is clearly not promoting someone, but maybe I don't know all the rules User:JamesFarington
• Comment It appears that the previous three comments are all from single purpose accounts that have edited nothing but this and the other articles forming part of the walled garden. Agent 86 19:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom -- Whpq 13:38, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.