Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berstoffenday

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. The author has now admitted this article is fiction. Which makes this a completely non notable article. CSD A7. malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 20:25, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Berstoffenday

• Hoax. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 15:28, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• "Berstoffenday" yeah sure... and a baron in britain circa 100 BC... Author, please go learn your history and Strong delete of this "article" please. -- Grafikm_fr 15:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• I also agree that he should be able to keep it there. Why should it be deleted when it isn't hurting anyone? If you can't prove that it is false, then keep it.-- Traevin 15:53, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment - above comment from User:69.250.174.6.

• Delete No sources. WP:NFT.Obina 16:03, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment This afd had been edited - these comments are not from those listed.Obina 16:07, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Fixed. Kuru ^talk 16:32, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Strong delete as hoax and block User:69.250.174.6 for changing people's votes in this AfD. Somebody will have to go back and fix these votes, since all of the "keep" votes shown above have been forged by User:69.250.174.6 and a simple revert is not enough to fix all of them. --Metropolitan90 16:26, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per previous comments. Article is unverifiable rubbish, and the comments in the article's talk page only confirm that it cannot be supported. I've already warned him about removing AfD notices - will add a note about forging votes for when he comes back from his current blocking, although one would think that obvious. Kuru ^talk 16:38, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Listen! Alright, I will admit that this is a work of fiction. I am the author of this, and I request that you please keep it up because it plays a part in a movie I am making and I really need it to still be up. If you could permit me that, I will be thankful. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.250.174.6 (talk • contribs) 17:48, 23 April 2006.
• Strong delete per nom and, obviously, consistent with the explanation supra by the page's creator. Joe 17:51, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.