Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bellaparker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Personally, I think we're going to look pretty silly if/when these guys pass WP:MUSIC, but who am I to truck with consensus? fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 16:45, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bellaparker

Definitely one of the better articles I've seen for a non-notable band, but the band is nonetheless not notable enough for an encyclopedia article. They basically fail all of the WP:MUSIC criteria that I could check. Two of the three reviews are from sites that I've never heard of, though perhaps someone here could vouch for their influence. The third (first listed) says nothing more than "Local bands that won't stay under the radar much longer" and lists a dozen bands from the area. Delete until they hit it big. See also Chad Geraci. —HorsePunchKid→龜 2005-12-08 08:25:59Z

• Delete. Per nom. Also see The Things We Say (album). Cnwb 08:55, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:V. Kappa 16:09, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per the WP:NMG proposal. If we kept everything that was verifiable, we'd have individual articles for practically every single copy of practically every single issue of practically every newspaper ever. — Haeleth Talk 19:33, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Haeleth. Stifle 23:53, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, fails all of the WP:MUSIC tests. Nandesuka 18:19, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.