Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beatrice Ice Gardens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Just enough for a consensus, methinks. --Fang Aili ^說嗎? 05:00, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Beatrice Ice Gardens

Makes no claim as to why it deserves an article. Wikipedia is not a junkyard. Delete --Ardenn 04:13, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. —ERcheck @ 04:18, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. props to ardenn for catching all this yorkcruft. pm_shef 04:58, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

comment, Pm_shef, please do not make false slanderous accusations, its very worthy of an article and is definetly not any kind of "cruft" as you attempt to claim --JohnnyCanuck 17:43, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

• 'Delete nn.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! 08:26, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep stub. It is doing no harm. Wikipedia is not paper. Davodd 11:14, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Bhoeble 11:48, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. It is one of Toronto's main arenas with spectator seating and is just as notable as the rest of Category:Indoor arenas in Canada. BoojiBoy 13:04, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and expand, its one of the best arenas in the GTA, hosted many international tournaments, practice facility of many NHLers, the main rink has an "european style" ice surface, the largest ice surface in the north america --JohnnyCanuck 17:43, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• I have expanded the article somewhat. Request nominator withdraw nom. BoojiBoy 18:53, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep notable  Funky Monkey  (talk)  19:01, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. RexNL 19:46, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, with fewer than 1000 results in Google, not really a matter of public interest. Quatloo 20:47, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

comment over 33,000 results in Google, originally called Ice Gardens, later sold naming rights to be called Beatrice Ice Gardens--JohnnyCanuck 21:37, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep as stub. Needs expansion, but seems notable enough. Wstaffor 23:14, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, seems like a reasonable stub. In its current state it could probably be merged into another article, but the stub leaves room for expansion. Mangojuice 03:13, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I'm familiar with the topic and can attest that it is notable, and not so granular it should merge into York University or anything. Samaritan 07:25, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Rewrite and keep. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(esperanza) 2006-04-20 07:45

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.