Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Batgirl LiveJournal Meme

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 07:42, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Batgirl LiveJournal Meme

Somebody posted a picture in their Livejournal. Then so did some other people. Then someone came to Wikipedia and wrote an article about it. Then I submitted it for deletion because it wasn't encyclopedic. Delete. Gamaliel 07:17, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as blogcruft. Hardly notable. --Kinu ^t/_c 07:30, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. I use LJ sometimes, but wasn't aware of this meme of (predominantly androgynous) batgirls. If it got notable media coverage, or a collection is published, then it would qualify. Schizombie 08:16, 3 March 2006 (UTC) A merge to Andi Watson might be OK. Schizombie 01:28, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Good idea, it might be worth a line or two over there. Gamaliel 01:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per Schizombie -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 10:13, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --kingboyk 10:41, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 14:41, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I was well aware of this phenomenon, and I still think it's too NN for inclusion. - Rynne 17:21, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 19:31, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, doesn't need its own article. --Mr. Vernon 21:48, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn --Grocer 18:35, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.