Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barefoot Radio
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:09, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Barefoot Radio
Non-notable podcast. Andrew Levine 04:53, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as NN --Ezeu 04:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete -- SusanLarson (User Talk, New talk, Contribs) 04:57, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -Jcbarr 04:58, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- This is a newcomer's first article/edit. I'm sad we AfD it two minutes after submission and three people agree five minutes later. -- Perfecto 05:12, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- I agree with you, its an unfortunate start for a newbie. However, I am not voting to delete it because I like to be unfriendly. It wouldnt be nicer to wait a while, then delete it anyway. --Ezeu 05:37, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia_talk:Please_do_not_bite_the_newcomers#Template_Proposal -- Perfecto 00:59, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- I agree with you, its an unfortunate start for a newbie. However, I am not voting to delete it because I like to be unfriendly. It wouldnt be nicer to wait a while, then delete it anyway. --Ezeu 05:37, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, I gladly pile on to a non-notable article's AfD, regardless of who created it. Are we supposed to give all newbies a free pass? That's where most of the spam comes from. User:Zoe|(talk) 05:13, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete with no tears. Daniel Case 05:58, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Zoe, but Perfecto's free to leave a nice note on the new user's talk page. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 06:40, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable podcast. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-11 07:13Z
- Why is this a non notable podcast?? Why can others have a similar description of their podcast and not be deleted? Why don't I get any reasons for deletion? Why not suggestions about how to edit the article? Barefoot Radio is Trademarked and will be around a long time, so why can't I write an entry for it? Somebody please explain the problem. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Voyagewiki (talk • contribs) 14:53, 11 January 2006.
- You may find some answers at Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (websites). --Ezeu 23:24, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Agreeing with deletion because this is non-encyclopedic. Only the biggest of the big podcasts get their own articles. This one ... just ain't notable. Cyde Weys votetalk 14:32, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete not notable. Eusebeus 23:05, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, but expand. Barefoot radio is a legitimate podcast (Google it). Perhaps instead of deletion, we request a stub and perhaps some pictures. krispymann25 15:46 15 Jan. 2006 (EST).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
