Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baker v. He

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Rx StrangeLove 05:13, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Baker v. He

No claim to notability despit {{explain-significance}} being there for quite some time. Appears to be non-notable -Werdna648 06:58, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete: News report. Without wider significance (rights of immigrants established/denied by precedent), there's nothing really here except a "Guess what? there was a court case." Geogre 16:51, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This is not even an appellate opinion; it looks like Tennessee procedure is to hear the case in Juvenile Court and then bring it to Chancery Court with trial de novo on the motion of a party. In other words, even if the public interest factor was high, this is basically just a trial court decision. Geogre has it right; while the case may have some implications for public policy regarding immigrants, it's really just an ordinary child welfare/adoption case. MCB 23:31, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. My former Constitutional law professor, Thomas E. Baker, once wrote an article entitled Tyranosaurus Lex, in which he noted somthing to the effect that the amount of new case law generated every year in this country would fill up a library. Speaking as someone who has contributed dozens of articles on notable cases, this ain't one of 'em. -- BD2412 ^talk 02:16, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as per BD2412. Sheesh.
• KeepLevKamensky

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.