Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autry Music Institute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete g11, spam, no notability asserted. NawlinWiki 17:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Autry Music Institute

The article does not appear to be verifiable from reliable sources. It looks like advertising for a non-notable music school. Most Google hits are from adverising and business directories, and most of the rest are from WP and sites pulling from WP. Donald Albury 00:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:SCHOOL, WP:V and WP:CORP. Tarret 00:26, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP is not a soapbox, and certainly not the yellow pages. BusterD 00:54, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per WP:CSD G11. Otherwise, strong delete as per above. --BrownHairedGirl ^{(talk) • (contribs)} 01:17, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete - May qualify as CSD material, as there's no assertion of notability. Torinir _{( Ding my phone My support calls E-Support Options )} 01:29, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• It's not a speedy delete, seeing as it's about 2 weeks old. Delete, fails notability guidelines. riana_dzasta 03:40, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • CSD have changed recently - there's no longer a statute of limitation on blatant copyright violations, and corporate vanity is speediable just like biographical vanity is. Zetawoof^(ζ) 05:42, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Look at the history. Am I alone in smelling spam? BTLizard 11:14, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. 161 Google hits, most of which are directory listings. -newkai t-c 16:16, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.