Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australians Against Further Immigration

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 19:44, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Australians Against Further Immigration

The page was created maliciously. When the offensive content was removed, the page was left devoid of content. aliceinlampyland 14:50, 29 November 2005 (UTC).

• Speedy delete as patent nonsense/attack, now empty per nom. Ifnord 15:07, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete now it appears empty. PJM 15:16, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Well-known minor political party, despite not having seats. Stub created. JPD 16:03, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. Was a speedy delete candidate originally, but now that it is here, it is on a very notable topic, and thus should be most definitely kept. Ambi 16:12, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep; a page getting vandalised is no reason for a speedy delete, plus the party is legit. Peyna 16:16, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. This is a legitimate political party. Agnte 16:17, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. If the quote can be confirmed, then add a citation link. --StuffOfInterest 16:56, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Listed on the Australian Electoral Commission's Register of Australian political parties see [1] and shown as having endorsed candidates in the 2004 Federal election. Also important as predecessors of the One Nation Party. Capitalistroadster 17:22, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. . Capitalistroadster 17:44, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, Google search seems to show this is fairly noteable. HackJandy 22:27, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, per Capitalistroadster. Cnwb 22:31, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep As above pfctdayelise 22:37, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I don't know what the article looked like when it was listed, but it's perfectly viable now. Sadly, even racists form a part of human knowledge. — Haeleth Talk 00:03, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, obviously, despite the puerile garbage that formed the first revision of the article. --Stormie 01:20, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. If only we didn't need this kind of article... ～J.K. 10:25, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as per Capitalistroadster. Sarah Ewart 23:44, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Writing an article on AAFI has been on my to-do list for a while. --Roisterer 08:27, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.