Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audio Analogue
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:17, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Audio Analogue
Article doesn't satisfy WP:VERIFY as it doesn't state any reliable sources. Article also appears to be vanity and possible spam as the creator of the article is actually mentioned in the article (Federico.Paoletti (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log)). This article has also been created in the Italian Wikipedia by a user of the same name (see it:Audio Analogue). —TheJC (Talk • Contribs • Count) 03:26, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, and for being an advertisement. Tychocat 07:34, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. & advert. Rob 11:01, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as advert/spam/vanity. --MCB 21:15, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep and cleanup. It is muy mal right now, but their equipment is widely available and reviewed on well-known audio review web sites like SoundStage. Deserves an article. --Aguerriero (talk) 16:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- I rewrote the article. --Aguerriero (talk) 21:16, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep now that article is rewritten. Yamaguchi先生 17:56, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep This page should be kept because Federico Paoletti has no interest in advertising the company having left it many years ago. It is only to give some history of the brand to those interested. Sprattico 19:10, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- Withdraw nomination as the article has been re-written and has resolved the problems it had when I nominated it. —TheJC (Talk • Contribs • Count) 10:16, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
