Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/At The Zoo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep per withdraw of nom. SynergeticMaggot 05:55, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] At The Zoo

Copyvio, so I listed with prod, was removed without explanation i kan reed 18:03, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - Simon and Garfunkel are popular enough that I don't see a problem with having an article on one of their songs; there are many songs with their own Wikipedia page. Someone should remove most of the lyrics - in fact, I think I will do that myself in just a minute - and try to persuade the author not to put them back. I don't think the problem is the existence of the article, I think the problem is the copyvio. --Brianyoumans 19:01, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - since the copyvio, which was the main portion of the article before, has been removed, I'd like to writhdraw my nomination. I beleive that since all votes are now keep, and i've withdrawn, that makes this a potential Speedy Keep. --i kan reed 19:47, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speddy Keep Nominator has withdrawn nomination. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Edgelord (talk • contribs).
• Keep. The copyvio has been removed. --Metropolitan90 02:49, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.