Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Ulwick (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No Consensus. Yanksox 00:12, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anthony Ulwick

This is recreated article deleted July 23, 2006. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Ulwick. It's an advert for book and business. Links on site go to Wikipedia articles, not Harvard Review. Company link only outside link. Mattisse(talk) 21:38, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: This article was not deleted and recreated, the previous nomination ended in no consensus. It was speedily deleted yesterday, which I reverted, since an article which has been discussed on AfD and survived is clearly not a speedy delete candidate. --Stormie 00:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I genuinely don't see anything at WP:CSD which says that an article that survived an AFD (with or without consensus) cannot be speedy deleted if it meets one or more criteria. If I'd missed that clause - and I may well have - please point me to it! :) --kingboyk 16:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment - You are right. There was no consensus on the last afd. I apologize for my error. General criteria for speedy deletion #4 provide for recreated deleted article. Whatever happened last time, this article still has to follow Wikipedia criteria of WP:V and WP:N and WP:OR. It's hard to do that without adding outside links to multiple independent sources. It's very important for Wikipedia articles to meet these to be a credible source, as it aims to be. Add some links, why don't you? According to the link provided below, provided by Peripitus, if you do not add them the article will be a candidate for speedy deletion. (Look down at the bottom of the page.) Mattisse(talk) 17:15, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, as per first discussion. --Stormie 23:03, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as passing the Published authors, editors and photographers who received multiple independent reviews of or awards for their work part of WP:BIO. His book What customers want seems to get him over the line. As it's passed AfD before as no consensus the nominator really needs to show why it now should be deleted rather than just renominating - Peripitus (Talk) 03:05, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 05:19, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I see no notability, and agree entirely with the nominator. --kingboyk 16:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Ulwick is a published author, and a notable figure in American business. He is considered an authority on product and market innovation, which may be more of a niche interest, and therefore would falsely appear to not be notable. --Ereid01 15:17, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• keep please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Ulwick passes bio as awarded published author Yuckfoo 17:22, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.