Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Stein

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Although the article is no longer a copyright violation, there is still a consensus to delete on the basis of notability. Deathphoenix ʕ 15:37, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Amy Stein

The page should be deleted as a copyright violation of http://www.amysteinphoto.com/biography.html. SteveHopson 17:02, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete Copyvio, vanity (?), self(?)-promo David Humphreys 17:51, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy as nn bio. No notability demonstrated. Websites reference subject's own website and subject's own student work.
• Speedy delete per CSD-A7, no assertion of notability. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 22:51, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I am poster, not affiliated with artist and new to Wiki. Rising star in NY photography world. Big fan and patron. Help. How do you clear the notability bar? (by User:64.131.201.187)

Publications; books; critical reviews; shows; stuff like that (and welcome). Rklawton 03:01, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep or userfy if deleted. Current contributor (from the edit history, it appears to be User:65.200.177.10 although it may be a dynamic IP in which case I'd recommend the user getting a Wikipedia account) appears to have addressed the Copyvio issues in the recent edits since this article was nominated. Therefore I've commented keep in this discussion, as the article appears to be undergoing changes and User:64.131.201.187 has stated (s)he's new to wikipedia and going to be working on the article. If consensus is delete though, I recommend moving the article to user space (and delete the cross-namespace redirect) so that the editor(s) are able to bring the article up to inclusion requirements - and further their understanding of the policies/guidelines we have on Wikipedia (either through use of the {{helpme}} template, the Village Pump, or from experience and input from others). TheJC ^Talk_{Contributions} 20:13, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, I don't think it effectively asserts notability (to my personal standards). -- Kjkolb 12:13, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Poster, again. Artist has been awarded PDN's Photo Annual award three times. She has been published in countless publications including the Washington Post, Vanity Fair Italia, Smithsonian Magazine, and Art News. She has had shows in London, Seattle and New York. She was selected for the Northwest Annual in 2004, the very prestigous Review Santa Fe in 2006, the 2006 Photographic Center NW Annual (if you are in Seattle, check it out next week), she just won the ASMPNY Image '06 award, and her work will be the subject of a feature in the August issue of Popular Photography. Would all of this information allow her past the Wiki velvet rope?

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.