Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ames Tiedeman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. howcheng {chat} 17:55, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ames_Tiedeman

Non-notable Oscarthecat 19:53, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Do not delete - Guinness Book sites product. Very notable... User:Onenex1000

• Comment. Page blanked by User:Onenex1000. Please do not blank the page during the AfD process. Humansdorpie 21:53, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, even if the product was notable, someone whose claim to fame is working for its North American distributor isn't. - Bobet 00:10, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Robomower (created from the non-biographical content of this article). Endomion 01:41, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete NN distributor. And a distributor doesn't even deserve the redirect, and the Robomower page is not properly capitalized anyway, and I would have AFD'd that page myself if I didn't like electric mowers so much — I just NPOV'd it. Chris the speller 18:51, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - It's notable, keep the article. User:VanillaX 27 December 2005
• Delete I don't even see how the product is notable, and none of the extravagent claims made about this guy are verified in any way. --InShaneee 03:50, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep"" I do not see any extravagant claims. This guy is changing the world.(—The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Onenex1000 (talk • contribs).)
• Delete non-notable. - Liberatore(T) 17:10, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.