Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Always Island

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 00:53, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Always Island

I think that this article should be deleted, as it has no meaningful content and does not have any references--Snailwalker | talk 21:18, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

I second that. grafikm_fr 21:32, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - even if it were sourced, it would deserve to get folded into the article about the book. --DMG413 21:34, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Delete never heard of the book 82.36.107.54 21:34, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, and if an article is written about the book, redirect there instead. Obscure fictional place in a somewhat obscure work of fiction. —Cuiviénen, Sunday, 2 April 2006 @ 22:47 (UTC)

[edit] Comments

• It seems that the user ImaGINAtion has added quite a few rather strange articles to Wikipedia, including 1944 in Video gaming (deleted now). I think someone should watch him/her... --Snailwalker | talk 21:37, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete the book returns no google hits and is probably a hoax Where ^(talk) 23:24, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:V. Based on Google, there is nothing to indicate that either the book or its author, Melya Gorbinski, ever existed. Fan1967 00:35, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete even if the book is real... we don't need this place. Quite a depressing place, really. I'll say. Kotepho 01:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 07:06, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.