Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allah-Kitten controversy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete User:Bobby1011 13.03.06

[edit] Allah-Kitten controversy

Non-notable alleged event on some guy's website. FreplySpang (talk) 04:12, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable, probable hoax. --Rory096 04:13, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep It - Thanks in advance. - Chaz365 04:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Note: This user appears to be Charles "Chaz" Miller, the creator of "Coptography" and the man who initiated this "controversy. Those should be deleted along with this article. --Rory096 04:24, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable nonsense. As with the Coptography article below, this guy likes excuses to put his name in WP. - Fan1967 04:25, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Drivel Palnu 04:26, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn hoax per Rory096 Alba 04:26, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete drivel. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles "Chaz" Miller, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coptography. bikeable (talk) 04:29, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy blatant hoax -Drdisque 04:40, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn hoax. --Terence Ong 05:18, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.