Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Rubit

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:03, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Alex Rubit

Creator of some Stargate fan fiction. -Aranel ("Sarah") 19:58, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete With the goal of breaking into the industry as a television writer and producer - when he becomes a writer and producer, he can have a page. Allegrorondo 20:12, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, smells like vanity. Sandstein 20:15, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
• I wouldn't consider it vanity, since no one said he wrote that page himself. I'm actually a fan of this series of his, which is pretty good. I wouldn't even consider it fan fiction; it much rather includes 3D art, original musical themes, etc. I vote to keep it, since I'm also aware that he's been working on a feature film project, which he'll be directing, for quite some time. Jim24 18:28, 15 August 2005

User's first edit. Jaxl | talk 20:38, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per Allegrorondo; non-notable. Jaxl | talk 20:38, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
• Wow. I just wanted to set straight that (as Jim24 suspected), Alex in fact did not create that page himself. He doesn't even know about it. I know that because it was me, a very good and old friend of his. In fact, Alex would be the last to even consider doing something like this. If you read his blog, you get a sense that he's a modest and quite funny guy. Anyway, I don't feel I have to right to vote, so do what you believe is right. Just wanted to prevent you from getting a false impression of the guy I call a friend. Have a good day! :-)

Comment: The Delete votes (including this one) aren't concerned with who wrote the article. Vanity is a frequent assumption when a non-notable bio appears, but regardless, it's still a non-notable bio, which is (regardless of authorship) grounds for deletion. Aspirations are wonderful, but they're not encyclopaedic. Lomn | Talk 21:38:06, 2005-08-15 (UTC)

• I never said that a delete vote is concerned with who wrote an article, which as I did say was me (not the guy himself). Delete it if you want to; I can't say that will make any big difference to anyone.
• Delete nn no matter who wrote it. --Etacar11 00:54, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.