Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albophobia (2 nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mackensen (talk) 14:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Albophobia

del hopeless neologism introduced in France (fr:Albophobie) but has absolutely no prominence in English language. The article cannot be salvaged by renaming into something else because in its shortness of a dicdef it conflates two notions: reverse racism, 9a rather controversia l topic, which deserves bettter coverage than a section in "racism") and usual inter-ethnic animosity, which presents anywhere where two different ethnoses contact, but which is not normally called "racism". `'mikkanarxi 15:54, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - per WP:NEO and WP:Not a dictionary. This article doesn't offer anything more than a definition of a neologism, and doesn't offer any addition information or references. Jayden54 16:12, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - per WP:NEO. A search for a definition of "albophobia" on Dictionary.com turns up nothing; "albophobia dictionary" on Google turn up multiple pages with "Grandiloquent Dictionary" listings on various blogs... definitely not reliable sources. "Albophobia" doesn't yield anything on thefreedictionary.com,MSN Encarta, yourdictionary.com, and Merriam-Webster Online. B.Wind 23:42, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I was the nominator for the previous AFD. It came out in the discussion that this was the beginnings of a translation of the French Wikipedia article, and I withdrew the nomination, with the idea that we should wait and see what the whole article looks like. I am also somewhat dubious as to whether the final result will be useful to the English Wikipedia, but the translation is clearly not finished; in fact, it now appears that the translator was confused by my efforts to prod and then AFD the article, and has stopped. I think at the very least the article should be clearly marked as a translation in progress; it may also be time now to simply delete the stub and wait until some new translator gets interested. Brianyoumans 01:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. WP:Not a dictionary. WMMartin 17:59, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.