Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Craig
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result wasspeedy keep as nomination withdrawn and no other arguments for deletion. GRBerry 03:21, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Alan Craig
consensus sought on this municipal councillor of a minor party for a London borough. 97 unique out of 835Ghits, mostly directly related to the electon results, or CPAX sites. A BBC news article names him as the only non-labour member of Newham borough, elected on an evangelical platform. Ohconfucius 06:39, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
comment Is this AfD because of WP:NN? Mitch 07:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- If that BBC article is true, and I don't doubt it is, then it is a keep for me. The article proves the guy is not a random councillor but a unique one: "only non-labour member of Newham borough, elected on an evangelical platform." - Mgm|(talk) 07:43, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment the BBC article was true when first published, but he is no longer unique - the CPA took a clean sweep of Canning Town South at the 2006 local elections. Catchpole 08:29, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Notable for being a fringe party candidate that actually got elected. Catchpole 08:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Agree with Catchpole's comments. Bagginator 10:27, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- nomination withdrawn That was the discussion I was looking for. Ohconfucius 10:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per Ohconfucius. Molerat 11:40, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per above comments coupled with withdrawal by nominator. RFerreira 18:48, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
