Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al babilly

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Joyous 01:55, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Al babilly

No real context, lack of info, seems to be non-notable despite what the article says. - Ta bu shi da yu 15:22, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Almost everything I can find is wikipedia mirrors. Delete, but I'll be easily swayed if someone can find some sources documenting notability, the internet isn't the ideal place for verifying these kinds of bio's. --fvw* 15:46, 2005 Jan 2 (UTC)
  • Changing to weak Keep. --fvw* 21:15, 2005 Jan 3 (UTC)
• Keep. [1] Bush Me Up 23:57, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. Megan1967 00:48, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep it. Wyss 03:32, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Again, as with others: can we try getting hold of people who know the relevant cultures instead of trying to guess from Google on things Google doesn't cover well? -- Jmabel | Talk 06:20, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
  • Well someone's going to have to document notability, and if notability isn't established in the article this is the place to go. And as Megan1967 has managed to find a small piece of evidence that is nonetheless sufficient (at least for me), it would appear the system is working fine. --fvw* 21:15, 2005 Jan 3 (UTC)
• Keep. Dan100 20:59, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.