Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akatsuki leader

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete per CSD:G4. Stifle (talk) 15:39, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Akatsuki leader

Information is too vague to be of any importance. May be an attack page --soUmyaSch 14:02, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete since it lacks any useful information and its content is probably unsalvageable anyway. -- Grafikm_fr ^(AutoGRAF) 14:05, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Akatsuki (Naruto). However, I have no idea why this would be considered an attack page(?) Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:12, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment "Not much is known about this person except that he acts like the leader of the Akatsuki" (emphasis mine) - This gives the impression that it is a derogatory remark. I may be completely wrong though. --soUmyaSch 14:18, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment, This article doesn't give any intro to what the hell Akatsuki is to someone unfamiliar with the stuff. That's why I got confused into thinking this to be some political group. --soUmyaSch 14:21, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Yes, but the article (and the picture) make it clear that it's talking about a fictional character: "...in the anime...", "...many fans believe...", "...of chapter 254..." and so forth. Pages about fictional characters should be NPOV just like any article, but they cannot by nature be attack pages. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
      • Comment The picture wasn't there when I AfDed. And the intro was so incoherent that I did no dare read the entire article. --soUmyaSch 14:26, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
        • I think it's always a good idea to read the whole article before nominating/voting for deletion. In any case, thank you for retracting the attack page part. Do you also agree to the redirect? Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:30, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
          • Whats the point in reading if one does not understand anything? Why would one sift through something that seems like garbage to find out what it might be talking about. Anywayz, it might be Redirected if it makes sense in the context of the parent article. --soUmyaSch 14:52, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No context, unsalvageable nonsense. -- Kicking222 14:33, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete I'm changing my vote (I couldn't figure out how to strike through my previous comment), as this was already deleted once today, and thus can be speedied by CSD G4. In addition, the original editor removed the AfD notice from the page. -- Kicking222 14:45, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nothing useful or encyclopaedic. --Terence Ong 14:44, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• In Soviet Russia, article deletes YOU!!! Non-notable. Buchanan-Hermit™..SCREAM!!!.... 00:08, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete more "he's got jagged hair like the Yondaime Hokage" crufty nonsense. Danny Lilithborne 02:06, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Akatsuki (Naruto). As above. --Kunzite 04:49, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per Kunzite. -- ReyBrujo 20:48, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.