Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajjan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. enochlau (talk) 15:22, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ajjan

Article is an extensive biographical sketch of a candidate who lost a bid for election to the US House of Representatives. Are all congressional candidates encyclopedic? - squibix 02:30, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

yes. maybe not in tiny Britannica but in wikipedia. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 00:49, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - I don't think that being a candidate automatically makes one notable. Few Google hits. Blackcats
• Delete as per above. Reads a bit like vanity/promo. Acyso 07:57, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep the article could benefit from a bit of cleanup though. --Chazz88 12:32, 2 January 2006 (UTC) (Additional comment: I think this article passes the College professor test --Chazz88 12:34, 2 January 2006 (UTC)}
• Delete -- Longhair 13:15, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Tim Pierce 15:49, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. No, candidates are non-notable. Unless the subject meets another criteria (which doesn't appear the case here). Ifnord 17:02, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, NN. - Liontamer 01:52, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I say it is encyclopedic... Now if he had lost the primary that would be different... Could use a cleanup though... --Nick Catalano (Talk) 17:16, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --NaconKantari 23:51, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete doubt if the subject passes WP:BIO, but don't think that he is quite notable enough to warrant an article. Bjelleklang - talk 00:01, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: If this is kept (which seems unlikely), it should be moved to George Ajjan. -Colin Kimbrell 16:27, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep move to George Ajjan . Tobias Conradi (Talk) 00:49, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, as per Blackcats. JeremyA 02:54, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.