Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Africanist
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep and Move to African Studies. Jaranda wat's sup 18:33, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Africanist
Transwikied to Wiktionary Scrappy36 02:46, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. There's no difference between this article and a stub. The stub saves people the trouble of having to visit Wictionary and from the danger of not finding out about it at all. Primetime 07:26, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and expand it to cover the history of the concept, notable Africanists, controversies and the like - just like the hundreds of other articles about occupations, which are already more than dictionary definitions. Calsicol 09:48, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Africanist is not merely a dictionary defination. --Ezeu 13:39, 22 December 2005 (UTC)See below. --Ezeu 23:17, 22 December 2005 (UTC)- Move to African studies, which, because of our systemic bias, does not yet exist. Tupsharru 14:55, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Move per Tupsharru. It annoys me that 'African studies' does not exist. --Ezeu 23:17, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletions. -- Humansdorpie 16:28, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: What to do with the related article Africanism? At present it is a dicdef which is already included in Wiktionary. Punkmorten 19:41, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
-
- A difficult one. I say redirect to 'Africanist' if it survives (or to whatever it is renamed to), and explain the difference there.--Ezeu 23:17, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Potential for expansion. Capitalistroadster 23:03, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Move to African studies per Ezeu. — mark ✎ 11:17, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.