Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Administrative divisions of North Carolina

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 12:08, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Administrative divisions of North Carolina

This article, while potentially useful, is currently nothing more than a template with a couple of links. If information is added, then consider this nomination withdrawn. Also, it seemed to have a bit of a problem loading - I'm not sure if that's a problem with my computer or with the article, but if anyone else gets it then let me know. Paul 04:13, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete i'm not even sure what this is supposed to be. So, I will say that it is most likely randomcrapcruft. M1ss1ontomars2k4 04:50, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. What is up with the question marks? I think the article (if it were not to be deleted) should be improved by removing the question marks and replacing them with real info. Funnybunny (^talk/_QRVS) 04:53, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I've tried things like Administrative divisions of Texas and there are no articles. If this were part of a series then it should be kept, but it seems as if it's a one-off. Tyrenius 07:07, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I couldn't tell if it was an article or an exam. Kevin 08:37, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Delete. I suspect that there could be a decent article written on this topic, but sdaly this isn't it — and a decent article would probably have to start from scratch. --BrownHairedGirl 12:24, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Comment There actually are similar articles for other states, and I think that such an article could be created for any state that doesn't have one, but this one is still pretty useless. Paul 13:04, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete It's not immediately obvious, but this article appears to have begun as a copy of Administrative divisions of New York. In fact there's still a couple of remenants from the original article. There's potential for a good article, but this is just a working draft. ScottW 16:39, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. COuld be an interesting article here, but the article looks like a jumble. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:58, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.