Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adara (porn star)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 00:01, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Adara (porn star)

If a porn star is "infrequently seen", does she count as a porn "star"? Delete as advertising and possible vanity. Vizjim 00:15, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

• Merge to some designated combination article, such as Pornographic actresses or some similar name. — Rickyrab | Talk 00:24, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or expand lots - Porn stars deserve an article. Bit part tits for hire on Sodomy Master 5:Return of the Nymphomaniac Clowns does not. - Hahnchen 00:44, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
  • A redlink... quick... someone start the article! Dpbsmith (talk) 01:41, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
    • I would do, but I need my copy back off Hahnchen...! ;) Vizjim 08:40, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
      • Hey wait... how is SM5:RotNC not notable?--Isotope23 20:32, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Jwissick^(t)(c) 00:58, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Porn "star" or "Pornstar" seems to be the accepted courtesy term for all erotic actresses and actors, whether stellar or not. We do not need individual articles on "infrequently seen" actresses and actors, no matter how much of them can be seen when they are seen. Dpbsmith (talk) 01:40, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom looks like vanity --JAranda | yeah 02:07, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity --Rogerd 02:14, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, even though its nice to know that even porn actresses realize the awesomeness of Wikipedia Paul 03:07, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: Not a star in my book. — C Maylett 03:50, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. NN. Article says she is "infrequently seen", claims no appearances after 2002, and links to a site which gives her "Current model status" as "Inactive". TheMadBaron 07:02, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. There's enough "pornstars" that are more "frequently" seen. Jamyskis Whisper, Contribs 13:10, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, it's enough with having porn stars at WP, to also grant a space to nn ones. Shauri 19:42, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete totally nn-bio.--Isotope23 20:32, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 20:54, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. alf 00:19, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn ≈ jossi ≈ 03:17, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn within the genre. 23skidoo 17:19, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.