Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Absolutely Raven

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:19, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Absolutely Raven

Crystal balling, WP:OR and for the same reasons listed in Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/That's_So_Raven_Movie - Yomangani 16:01, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Dark Shikari 16:04, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nom. Scorpiondollprincess 16:07, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom WP:OR no sources, no Ghits.--Dakota 16:20, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment, no opinion... but I swear this exact article was just AfD'd not a week ago...--Isotope23 17:20, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

I thought the same, but I couldn't find it. It was probably So Totally Absolutely Raven or That's nearly completely and utterly finally so Raven or a variation. Yomangani 17:26, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Same here but I could not find it either and there is no history of deleted edits.--Dakota 17:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. I believe the one you're thinking of was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raven Too!. --Metropolitan90 04:02, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as this is not a crystal ball. --Natalie 17:37, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Absolutely future gazing. ju66l3r 18:23, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete... is it just me, or is this out-of-hand crystal balling of Disney Channel shows a little creepy? --Kinu ^t/_c 18:45, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Absolutely Delete, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 19:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Coredesat. Just silly. HomeTOWNboy 20:33, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Dpbsmith (talk) 00:27, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No sources, so it's speculation. Ziggurat 01:31, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:NOT a crystal ball. We need to warn the user(s) who keep recreating these silly articles. --NeoChaosX 09:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.