Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham Lincon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy keep; bad faith nomination in the wrong place --SPUI (talk) 19:18, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Abraham Lincon

Bad faith redirect created to take up space. Also made in violation of WP:POINT Gateman1997 19:06, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

• Just incase it wasn't clear, my vote is Delete.Gateman1997 19:07, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - Redirects are cheap and don't hurt anyone. This should also be on Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion. Evil Monkey∴Hello 19:13, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. It is easy to mispell "Lincoln" as "Lincon" when using the search box. Let's see some evidence before you start throwing around accusations of bad faith, eh? What violation of WP:POINT was this, exactly? --fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 19:15, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
  • In the middle of an argument on the link above the user Silensor created this article/redirect to make a WP:POINT. It's all there in black and light blue.Gateman1997 19:16, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.