Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abortion / ethics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Userfied to User:Edwardandrewlane/Sandbox - This AfD has been closed early because the new user who created the article has expressed a sincere interest to learn how to be a Wikipedian and edit articles. See the user's talk page for details. Thank you. --HappyCamper 12:33, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Abortion / ethics

Was put for speedy delete but didn't seem to qualify for any of the criteria. Nevertheless, this essay is a pile of POV and original research. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 10:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

• This is in fact not Point of View, nor is it Original research, I have merrley explained the views of different ethical systems using a few figures from sites to back them up. It is primarily aimed at AS level R.S. in which the candidate must be able to apply different ethical systems to a medical practice. —This unsigned comment was added by Edwardandrewlane (talk • contribs) .

• This is in fact not Point of View, nor is it Original research, I have meerley explained the views of different ethical systems using a few figures from sites to back them up. The views expressed by various people are in fact views ofrelativley famous philosophers, such as Ramsay and Curran, as well as systems like Natural Law Theory (N.L.T) which is a morall code widely used by the Catholic church. It is primarily aimed at AS level R.S. in which the candidate must be able to apply different ethical systems to a medical practice. —This unsigned comment was added by 86.135.105.186 (talk • contribs) .
• Delete "I have explained the views" and the fact you have actually stated it's "By" whoever looks very much like OR. The nature of the text makes it look like a cut 'n' paste job from somewhere as well. Is this a copyright violation from some website? If this is to remain it needs a huge amount of cleanup and renaming to something like "Ethical aspects of abortion". Tonywalton  | Talk 11:08, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Comment Author has explained on my talk page that this is in fact a cut-paste from his own work as a PowerPoint presentation. Fair enough, no copyvio then, but it's still OR. Tonywalton  | Talk 11:54, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - some usable information, but probably better to show these new Wikipedians who wrote the article how to incorporate information into Wikipedia properly instead. --HappyCamper 11:41, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Comment - done that, HappyCamper, on the new user's talk page. He's off having a read of the links I provided now. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 11:48, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.