Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Choudhary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 14:23, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Abhishek Choudhary and related articles

A group of non-notable articles: Abhishek Choudhary, Abhishek choudhary (redirect page), Point Events Driven Learner, Pedler (redirect page), Romenagri(no release yet, vaporware). Delete. utcursch | talk 10:21, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Keep. I do believe that the subject is somewhat notable within his circle, and Google returned many relevant hits. --¿Exir?¡Kamalabadi! 10:27, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Google returns hits to his profile at mailing lists (sarai/others), Savannah, forums, groups (Yahoo/Google/others) , frappr etc. While I like people who contribute to or are interested in free software, there is no sign of notability here. There are only few newspaper links[1][2], which are about a cricketer. utcursch | talk 10:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete all - not nearly enough notability to warrant all those articles, let alone one. Bubba hotep 17:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all. I saw nothing via a Google search which proved notability[3] , or any indication that this individual meets WP:BIO. Looks like self-promotion. --Elonka 21:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete-seems to be highly non notable. Nileena joseph ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 19:07, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all. Interestingly, I know the name - of the cricketer of course. Would not surprise me if he played in test matches already. Now THAT one may be notable, but this here looks like spam. Drop it - will only hinder when a cricket enthusiast wants to write an article. --Pan Gerwazy 01:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.