Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A kiss could be deadly/Temp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was belated speedy keep, incorrect nomination. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 10:33, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A kiss could be deadly/Temp

I have asked the creator to only make temp pages from his/her own user page. Bobby1011 00:44, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

comment...which begs the question "why?" In any case, it hardly seems like a reason for deletion. This band gets some tens of thousands google hits, and appears to have done some touring, so they would be very likely to reach the notability level for an article. Grutness...wha? 00:59, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: The user likely created the page by following the link provided in the CopyVio text at A kiss could be deadly, which is legitimate grounds for having a subpage in the Main namespace. --Kinu ^t/_c 01:03, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Ok, I read the A kiss could be deadly page with the copyrights violation tag. You're right, it's shouldn't be deleted. But it will have to be deleted once the text is transfered, or won't it? Bobby1011 06:40, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

• The temp page will be deleted by the administrator who settles the copyvio issue. Microtonal 23:16, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

• This nomination should probably not have arisen. It was correct of the creator to make a temp page, as that is what you do when a copyvio arises. Stifle 21:58, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.