Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ASP Examples

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:34, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ASP Examples

Basically the same reasons given for Active Server Pages/Hints: This page has no point being in Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a usage guide.[1] Wikipedia is not an instruction manual.[2] The article is full of original research. If that's not enough, this article is nothing more than a messy, poorly organized hodgepodge of random thoughts that are available in better form in many other places. Nova SS 04:25, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as it violates a plethora of Wikipedia rules. The article does not explain itself in any way. Aplomado - UTC 04:46, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki to WikiSource or WikiBooks. If the author has some helpful hints, then one of those projects would be more appropriate than Wikipedia. --Elkman - ^(talk) 05:04, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• It's pretty crappy even so, but transwiki to wikibooks and see if they can make heads or tails of it. Alba 12:46, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
  • The content at ASP Examples is such garbage that "transwiki"-ing is of minimal value. Just skimming through it, I found a few outright incorrect statements and blatant original research. I strongly encourage votes to delete. Nova SS 15:01, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. WP:NOT and instruction manual. And do not Transwiki, the amount of material here is such the overhead cost of doing that is not worth it. Herostratus 15:44, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. As above. --Ricaud 16:32, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Funky Monkey 22:39, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, do not transwiki. There isn't enough worthwhile content for Wikibooks to do much with, and Wikibooks already has too many false starts like this one. Zetawoof 22:09, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. incog 16:00, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, could become worthy of a transwiki but is not as currently written. Cool3 02:20, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.