Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AMK-BMK

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:04, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AMK-BMK

This page was nominated for speedy deletion with the reason "Complete fancruft", which isn't really a valid criterion so it's here. However, I'm bound to agree with the reasoning. The terms also don't seem to be in wide use based on a cursory google search (amk+mortal kombat gets some results, but only things that refer to this usage are wikipedia mirrors). - Bobet 10:18, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

• Comment You are up against a hundred-headed monster. I too have tried to get video game fancruft (i.e. Street Fighter universe) deleted. It's impossible... Medico80 10:36, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per the article: "...AMK-BMK are not used by Midway or Mortal Kombat's creators...". Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:03, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - made up term not in wide use -- Whpq 12:58, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - He's not up against a hundred-headed monster- this isn't fancruft. It's just something someone made up. WP:NOT and all that. Also, the computer and video games Wikiproject keeps track of most AfD's having to do with it, most are deleted. --PresN 14:38, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 14:38, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above --Peephole 15:43, 4 August 2006 (UTC)--
• Delete I don't think this so much fancruft as something made up in school one day. Ace of Sevens 15:51, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as Unverifiable. No sources cited, and I fail to see how any could ever be cited. Smells strongly of WP:NFT. Scorpiondollprincess 16:41, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. I can't believe this has been around for over a year. And that they stole the term away from the disambiguation page! Please fix that, too. --SevereTireDamage 23:41, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. This has survived for how long?! RandyWang (^raves/_{review me!}) 02:43, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete It's just made up. I've personally never heard it used. ^---SilentRAGE! 15:02, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NFT. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:NFT. BryanG^(talk) 05:19, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per the invisible nominator, this is not a verifiable subject. Yamaguchi先生 22:51, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NFT, WP:V and Starblind's comments. --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 22:59, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.