Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/6 References

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. Mo0[talk] 06:36, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 6 References

Delete εγκυκλοπαίδεια*(talk) 22:16, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Advertisement with no useful content. --Hurricane111 22:17, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

• Analyze. User 160.39.129.27 -- with no previous edits -- created several large articles about one Alexander Turney Stewart in about 30 minutes. Some thoughts: (1) They are obviously copied from an existing document -- no one can type that fast -- which raises but does not prove copyvio. (2) What the person did was create several articles named: Alexander Turney Stewart, 1 Stewart's Early Years, 2 His Road To Success..., 4 Later Years, 5 Death And Influence, and 6 References. So we need to treat those as one issue. Some of those have been speedied, some VfD'd, and some just with merge or warning tags. I don't know what's going on here either. Our boy's a but rash, but this is not neccesarily vandalism or copyvio, and we might end up with a good article about Alexander Turney Stewart out of all this. Herostratus 23:02, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
  • I can type that fast. Watch me. So the idea that its necessarily copyvio is not true. There are people who do exist that can type that quickly. Follow how quickly I make edits on here, and how many big edits I've made in the past 2 weeks. I'm sure its comparable with the amount that this person made. Ergo, not necessarily copyvio. Zordrac 01:18, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
• In Progress. Anon new editor is apparently breaking the old, existing Alexander Turney Stewart article into smaller seperate articles (the articles are inapropriately named, but he may be in draft phase, and will Move them later. I don't know why she's doing this and she hasn't responded to my message. Perhaps she is planning to expand the Alexander Turney Stewart such that it will be too long for a single article? Doesn't seem to be any species of vandalism. Suggest we wait 'til she's done and see what we have then. Herostratus 05:39, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep for now as good faith attempt at article. Zordrac 01:16, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
• Climax and Resolution User has not responded, has not appeared. Wierd. At first I thought he was just splitting the article, but now I think he created the text. Anyway, all is back in main article and I'm going to speedy all these seperate articles now. Herostratus 21:28, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.