Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3XC

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Phroziac ^(talk) 14:29, September 8, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 3XC

Vanity page, seems to refer to a school band with no discography to speak of. Netvor 12:19, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

No it doesn't!!! (previous unsigned comment by user:Arza89)

What are you talking about. THis is the best band around. DO you even live in melbourne. dont give me that -'no discography to speak of'- posh tone. just say they have no cd out yet... its not that hard... say it with me... they have no cd out yet... just wait till you see 3xc on the front cover of a mag saying "Best of the Best". Get with the times.... Posted by Raph (previous unsigned comment by user:138.217.52.192)

I never said that 3XC is not the best band around. That is your personal opinion and I will not challenge it. Anyway, please have a look at WP:MUSIC for Wikipedia's policy on the level of notability required for an article. 3XC appears to qualify for none of the criteria mentioned in that article. Finally, I would like to suggest using Talk:3XC for discussions regarding the band, as well as regarding the policy in WP:MUSIC. Let's keep this page for the VfD process. --Netvor 12:46, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

Everyone deserves a chance so I'll support you guys *ary is standing behind me with a gun*. But for the public to decide, if you have noticed, half of the entire 3xc team(including people like producers etc..) are asians!When have you ever seen an asian group reach the number one charts? But then again because you haven't you might want to support it for that reason...Jay-T

• Delete. "In the next few years they plan to be the best urban/hip-hop/R&B group out of Australia" - which can't be hard - and yet they list the Lighthouse Family as one of their influences. Clearly a hoax. -Ashley Pomeroy 12:36, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, either band vanity or band cruft, nn, and certainly nt encyclopaedic. Usrnme h8er 12:43, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. NN, vantiy DV8 2XL 12:50, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Delete It's probably a malicious hoax, but even if it's not it is still unverifiable and it doesn't pass WP:MUSIC. --Apyule 13:25, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Delete, but hold nose while doing so, for safety. SaltyPig 15:46, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
• strong delete OR userfy utterly lacking in street cred, mate. Roodog2k 16:19, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete lol@wiggers that know how to use a computer and edit wikipedia. Vanity page. Gold Stur 20:35, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - Good luck with the band Ralph. - Hahnchen 23:31, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - no evidence presented that they meet WP:Music as yet. Capitalistroadster 23:41, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nothing suggesting a whisper at WP:MUSIC. If the quote cited above is carried out in full, they could of course come back in a few year's time. -Splash 23:56, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.