Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/30/60

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 20:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 30/60

Local high school show. No notability outside of that very local community. The talk page explains:

"It is one of the highlights of Colony that the administration is most proud of. It is not an advertisement, it is merely an article on a popular show which needs to be recorded of."

Fair enough but Wikipedia is not MySpace. Pascal.Tesson 19:56, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom What? No Sparkle Motion? At least I hope they got copyright permission... Kids today... Bwithh 21:13, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I cannot believe the Donnie Darko wiki article does not shout-out to Sparkle Motion <=PBwithh 21:15, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete A yi yi... -- Kicking222 13:32, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Than what needs to get done to keep this page from being deleted? This is ludicrous. Very local community? This show is known all over Southern California! About time it finally got it's own page.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by WorldEpcot (talk • contribs) .

Comment known all over Southern California? I would think that this is at least a mild exageration [1]. Pascal.Tesson 18:48, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. if it is "known all over Southern California" then there should be a non-trivial mention of it in a reliable source. Short of that, its not notable for inclusion in an encyclopedia. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 18:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 17:09, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Alright, whatever. This is absolutely crazy. I suppose this isn't "a website that allows any visitor to freely edit its content." And when I say it is known all over Southern California, it is not an exaggeration. So much chaos over one simple page.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by WorldEpcot (talk • contribs) .

Look, no one is saying that what you say is not right. IT MIGHT BE CORRECT. That is cool. If the show is well known over Southern California, then CITE A SOURCE. Link to a webpage that reviews it. Cite a newspaper article that mentions it. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Please read this over. If something is worthwhile, then it has been mentioned somewhere besides wikipedia. If you cite your article and cross reference it well, it will probably not be marked for deletion. No one is saying that the 30/60 show is AUTOMATICALLY not worthy of inclusion in wikipedia. You just need to demonstrate its noteworthyness, and it will be included. If you CANNOT do this, I support its deletion. If you can do this, I will support your arguement to keep it. --Jayron32 15:58, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

You're right, this isn't a website that allows any visitor to freely edit its content. This is an encyclopedia. Edits have to demonstrably conform to guidelines involving Verifiability, neutrality, and similar notability criteria, including WP:NFT and generally WP:NOT.–♥ «Charles A. L.» 17:27, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.