Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2200

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect - Liberatore(T) 18:55, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 2200

Note that this acticle was a redirect to 22nd century before one sock of User:Science3456 changed it to a disambiguation page and another sock immedeatly listed it for deletion. A trick he has pulled before. —Ruud 01:17, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

• Is this page necessary? If not, then it should be deleted. Booking563 21:40, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy keep as redirect to 22nd century. Reverted vandalism. —Ruud 21:43, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

You need to be careful about how you use the word "vandalism". That was a very legimate edit, not vandalism. Anyway, it shouldn't be reverted while the afd is still going. 205.188.117.74 22:34, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

With both the person who changed this from a redirect to an article and then nominating it for deletion being socks of User:Science3456, I'm willing to call this vandalism. —Ruud 22:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

It's not an article. It's a disambiguation page. Learn the difference. 152.163.100.139 01:16, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Read the comment above. —Ruud 01:19, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep the way it is. 205.188.117.74 22:34, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
• Retain as redirect. -- Saberwyn 23:37, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete — The topic of whether a particular 00 year counts as the first or last in a centurn is well-covered by the century article. 2200 is not the same as the 22nd century. In fact, to many people it is the start of the 23rd century. I reverted the redirect because others can have a different opinion. — RJH 16:26, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Not the place for the end/beginning of century argument, but still a year article in the standard Wikipedia format. ProhibitOnions 21:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect (i.e. keep and revert to the redirect version) – Gurch 10:31, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to 22nd Century. - Erebus555 18:54, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
• WP:NOT a crystal ball, therefore, there is no need for a year page for a year 194 years in the future. Might as well delete it. 2200 is not the same thing as the 22nd century OR the 23rd century. I changed this page to a redirect to 22nd century previously, simply because that matched what looked like precedent at 2300 and so on, but it really doesn't make sense. Mangojuice 06:10, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per above ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 23:54, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.