Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010s in fashion
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:17, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 2010s in fashion
Article (obviously a template) was tagged as patent nonsense, which isn't correct. Maybe the fashionistas really are looking ahead in a verifiable way? Doubtful, but I'm bringing it here for a wider audience in case I'm wrong. Creator user:Jocasta shadow seems to be an editor in good standing. -- nae'blis 12:31, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
- No crystal balls. Delete. Alba 12:42, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete what a load of absolute crystal balls. Why sreate the article in the first place? Why not wait 5 years when we might actually need such an article? - Blood red sandman 12:51, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - rubbish -- Whpq 14:18, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, crystal ball. Besides, I happen to know we'll all be dead by 2010. Kafziel 15:50, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, WP:NOT a crystal ball. --Terence Ong (T | C) 15:53, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as obvious crystal balls. --Kinu t/c 16:55, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - This is the definition of crytal ball. Bakaman Bakatalk 17:41, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. It will get more relavent as time goes on. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dermann69 (talk • contribs).
- Delete. Obvious crystal ball, seeing as we haven't even finished 2000s in fashion. AgentPeppermint 18:18, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. As of now, the future sucks poop so far; so wait until then to find out the trends. --Nintendude message 00:37, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. No crystal balls. Dekar 22:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.