Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 Montana spelling bee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 14:44, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 2006 Montana spelling bee

Just after this article was created, its editor was banned as a troll, so it probably won't get expanded on its own. Per WP:AGF, listing here for discussion (expand or delete) rather than tag as prod or speedy. I offer no opinion for the time being. Thatcher131 04:50, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. The Scripps National Spelling Bee and a list of winners therein is notable, and is thus good enough for me. An article on every single qualifier bee doesn't seem particularly encyclopedic or necessary. I doubt there's much to expand anyway. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:21, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, regional spelling bees are not notable. Royboycrashfan 05:25, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable regional event.  (aeropagitica)  06:31, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Royboycrashfan and aeropagitica. MLA 09:14, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable troll-droppings.--Isotope23 14:45, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, I fail to see how this spelling bee is of any importance, and I also think English is the only language to ever need spelling bees. JIP | Talk 15:50, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:03, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per JIP Admrb♉ltz (T | C | k) 07:47, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.