Wikipedia:Articles for deletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Before listing an article for deletion here, consider whether a more efficient alternative is appropriate:
Shortcut:
WP:AFD
WP:VFD
Deletion Debates
Articles (by category)

Templates

Images & media

Categories

User categories

Stub types

Redirects

Miscellaneous

Deletion review

policy - log - tools

Articles for Deletion (AfD) is where Wikipedians discuss whether an article should be deleted. Articles listed here are debated for up to five days, after which the deletion process proceeds based on Wikipedia community consensus. The page is then either kept, merged and/or redirected, transwikied (moved to another Wikimedia project, such as Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikiquote, Wiktionary, or another language's Wikipedia—please note that it cannot be transwikied to WikiTravel [1] or Wikinews), renamed/moved to another title, userfied to the creator's user page or user subpage, or deleted per the deletion policy.

This article explains what you should consider before nominating, the steps for nominating single or multiple pages, and how to discuss an AfD. It also links to the list of articles currently under consideration, and to faster alternatives to AfD: two simpler companion processes, Wikipedia:Speedy deletions and Wikipedia:Proposed deletion, exist for the deletion of articles that are generally uncontroversial deletion candidates, such as vandalism, patent nonsense, and erroneously-created User pages.

The Wikipedia deletion policy explains the criteria for deletion and the guide to deletion may help you understand why an article has been nominated.

Contents

[edit] Current discussions

Articles being considered for possible deletion are indexed by the day on which they were first listed.

Add a new entry

Alternatively, if you are confident it is not a controversial issue, consider using {{subst:prod|reason for deletion}} instead (see Wikipedia:Proposed deletion). See the proposed deletion current nominations.

[edit] Old discussions

[edit] Categorized discussions

Biographical | Fiction and the arts | Games and sports | Media and music | Organisation, corporation, or product | Places and transportation | Science and technology | Society topics | Web and internet | Indiscernable or unclassifiable topic | Nominator unsure | Topic not yet sorted

[edit] Before nominating an AfD

Notability and
inclusion guidelines

Notability guidelines

Other


Active proposals


More... subject-specific
See also: Precedents,
Notability verification

  • Read and understand the Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
  • Consider adding a tag such as {{cleanup}} or {{disputed}} instead; this may be preferable if the article has some useful content.
  • Consider making the page a useful redirect or proposing it be merged rather than deleted. Neither of these actions requires an AfD.
  • Click "what links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
  • Read the article's talk page, which may provide reasons why the article should or should not be deleted.
  • Familiarize yourself with the frequently cited guidelines WP:BIO, WP:COI, WP:CORP, WP:MUSIC, WP:FICT, WP:RS, and WP:WEB.
  • Before nominating a recently created article, please consider that many good articles started their Wikilife in pretty bad shape. Unless it is obviously a hopeless case, consider sharing your reservations with the article creator, mentioning your concerns on the article's discussion page, and/or adding a "cleanup" template, instead of bringing the article to AfD.
  • Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for Wikipedia:speedy deletions or Wikipedia:Proposed deletion.
  • If you expect that the AfD page will be edited by newcomers to Wikipedia (possibly because the article itself is linked from some visible place outside Wikipedia), or if you notice this happening after the AfD page is created, you might want to insert the {{Afdanons}} template into it.
  • Note that if you are editing under an IP address because you have not yet created a user account, you will not be able to complete the AfD process, as anonymous contributors are currently unable to create new pages (as required by step 2 of "How to list pages for deletion," below). If this is the case, consider creating a user account before listing an article on AfD.

[edit] How to list pages for deletion

This page describes how to list for deletion articles and their associated talk pages. See the related pages for templates, categories, redirects, stub types, pages in the Wikipedia namespace, user pages, or images and other media, or use copyright violation where applicable.


To list a single article for deletion for the first time, follow this three-step process:

I.
Put the deletion tag on the article.

  Insert the {{subst:afd1}} tag at the top of the page.

  • Please do not mark the edit as minor.
  • Please include in the edit summary the phrase
    nominated for deletion: see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName]]
    replacing PageName with the name of the page you are proposing for deletion.
  • You can check the "Watch this page" box to follow the page in your watchlist. This allows you to notice if the AfD tag is removed by a vandal.
  • Save the page.

(If the article has been nominated for deletion before, use {{subst:afdx}} instead of {{subst:afd1}}. See Template Talk:afdx. This does not include articles that have only had the {{prod}} tag removed.)

II.
Create the article's deletion discussion page.

  The resulting AfD box at the top of the article should contain a link to "Preloaded debate" in the AfD page.

  • Click that link to open the article's deletion discussion page. Some preloaded text and some instructions will appear.
  • Give a reason for the deletion and a category for the debate (instructions will be on the page).

OR

  • Click the link saying "this article's entry" to open the deletion-debate page.
  • Insert this text:
    {{subst:afd2 | pg=PageName | cat=Category | text=Reason the page should be deleted}} ~~~~
    replacing PageName with the name of the page you are proposing for deletion, Category with a letter indicating the category of the debate, and Reason... with the reasons you think the page should be deleted.
  • Consider checking "Watch this page" to follow the progress of the debate.
  • Please use an edit summary such as
    Creating deletion discussion page for [[PageName]] because ...
    replacing PageName with the name of the page you are proposing for deletion and providing reasons for deletion.
  • Save the page.
III.
Notify users who monitor AfD discussion.
  • Copy the tag below, and then click  THIS LINK to open the deletion log page. At the bottom of the log page, insert:
{{subst:afd3 | pg=PageName}}

replacing PageName appropriately.

  • Include the discussion page's name in your edit summary like
    Adding [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName]]
    replacing PageName with the name of the page you are proposing for deletion.
  • Save the page. Your insertion will be automatically expanded to the same form as the preceding lines in the file: {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}}.

(If you used template {{subst:afdx}} instead of {{subst:afd1}}, use "PageName (2nd nomination)" instead of "PageName" for a second nomination, etc.).

To list multiple related pages for deletion see here.

WikiProject User scripts may have some scripts to streamline these steps.

Once listed, deletion discussions can, optionally, also be transcluded into an appropriate deletion sorting category, such as the ones for actors, music, academics, or for specific countries; which helps attract people familiar with a particular topic area. Please see the list of categories.

  • It is generally considered civil to notify the good-faith creator and any main contributors of the article that you are nominating the article. To find the main contributors, look in the page history or talk page of the article and/or use TDS' Article Contribution Counter. For your convenience, you may use {{subst:AFDWarningNew|Article title}} (for creators who are totally new users), {{subst:AFDWarning|Article title}} (for creators), or {{subst:Adw|Article title}} (for contributors or established users).
  • Please also consider leaving a notification on the project talk page of any WikiProjects identified by colored boxes at the top of the article's talk page.
  • To avoid confusing newcomers, the reasons given for deletion should avoid Wikipedia-specific acronyms.
  • Place a notification on significant pages that link to your nomination, to enable those with related knowledge to participate in the debate.
  • If recommending that an article be speedily deleted, please give the criterion or criteria that it meets, such as "A7" or "biography not asserting importance".

[edit] How to list multiple related pages for deletion

Sometimes you will find a number of related articles, all of which you feel should be deleted together. To make it easier for those participating in the discussion, it may be helpful to "bundle" all of them together into a single nomination. However, for group nominations it is often a good idea to only list one article at afd and see how it goes, before listing an entire group.

Examples of when articles may be bundled into a single nomination:

  • An article about a band and three articles about its members, none of whom has done anything else notable outside of the band.
  • An article about a company/organization and a second article about its founder, who has done nothing else of note.
  • An article about a video game/book and related articles for characters within it.
  • An article about an album and related articles for its songs.
  • An article about any topic and other articles with the same content but with different titles.

If any of the articles you are considering for bundling could stand on its own merits, then it should be nominated separately. Or to put it more succinctly, if you are unsure of whether to bundle an article or not, don't.

To bundle articles for deletion, follow these steps:

I.
Nominate the first article for deletion.

  Follow the steps as outlined above.

II.
Nominate the remaining articles.

  On each of the remaining articles, at the top insert the following:

{{subst:afd1|PageName}}

Replace PageName with the name of the first page to be deleted, not the current page name. In other words, if Some article was the first article you nominated, replace PageName with Some article. As before, please include the word "AfD" in the edit summary and please do not mark the edit as minor. Save the page. Repeat for all articles to be bundled.

(If the article has been nominated before, use {{subst:afdx}} instead of {{subst:afd1}}, and replace "PageName" with the name of the page plus a note like "(second nomination)" for a second nomination, etc. See Template talk:Afdx for details.)

III.
Add the remaining articles to the nomination.

  Go the first article's deletion discussion page,
  Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName, and add a note
  under your original nomination listing all related pages, for example:

I am also nominating the following related pages because [insert reason here]:

In the edit summary, note that you are bundling related articles for deletion.

[edit] AfD etiquette

  • Users participating in AfD discussions are expected to be familiar with the policies of Civility and Wikiquette and the guideline Don't bite the newbies.
    • This also applies to the other deletion pages.
  • AfDs are public. Please keep to public-facing levels of civility.
  • Don't make personal attacks against people who disagree with you.
  • Don't add tally boxes to the deletion page.
  • Don't reorder comments on the deletion page to group them by keep/delete/other.
  • Do not make derogatory comments about living people. These may be removed by any editor.

[edit] How to discuss an AfD/Wikietiquette

  • The debate is not a vote; please make recommendations on the course of action to be taken, sustained by arguments.
  • Please have a look at the article before making a recommendation. Do not base your recommendation solely on the information supplied by the nominator. For understanding the situation it may also help to look at the history of the article.
  • Also, please read the earlier comments and recommendations. They may contain relevant arguments and further useful information.
  • Start your comments or recommendations on a new bulleted line (that is, starting with *), and sign them by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs, making sure it is indented (using multiple bullets).
  • Please disclose whether you are an article's primary author or if you otherwise have a vested interest in the article.
  • Unregistered or new users are welcome to contribute to the discussion, but their recommendations may be discounted, especially if they seem to be made in bad faith (for example, if they misrepresent their reasons). Conversely, the opinions of logged in users whose accounts predate the article's AfD nomination are given more weight.
  • Multiple recommendations by users shown to be using "sock puppets" (multiple accounts belonging to the same person) will be discounted.
  • Usually editors recommend a course of action in bold text, e.g., "Keep" or "Delete".
  • Please make only one recommendation; if you change your mind, modify your original recommendation rather than adding a new one. The recommended way of doing this is to use strike-through by enclosing a deleted part between <s> and </s>, as in "Delete Speedy keep".
  • Arguments commonly used to recommend deletion are: "unverifiable" (violates WP:V), "original research" (violates WP:OR), "unencyclopedic", and "non-notable", if example, for a person, does not meet WP:BIO (it is advisable out of courtesy to use the latter term, rather than the former). The accusation VANITY should be avoided [2], and is not in itself a reason for deletion. The argument "non-neutral point of view" (violates WP:NPOV) is often used, but often such articles can be salvaged, so this is not a very strong reason for deletion either.

You don't have to make a recommendation on every nomination; consider not participating if:

  • A nomination involves a topic with which you are unfamiliar.
  • You agree with the consensus that has already been formed.

Also, please see this discussion on the talk page of Wikipedia:Deletion Policy regarding notability. Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Non-notability may also prove helpful.

Deletion Debates
Articles (by category)

Templates

Images & media

Categories

User categories

Stub types

Redirects

Miscellaneous

Deletion review

policy - log - tools

[edit] What to do after an AfD discussion has passed with a confirmation?

Nothing. If the discussion has been listed according to the rules above, at the end of the discussion period (about five days), it will always be closed within a few more days at most. Asking for someone to close the discussion is not necessary.

[edit] Related pages

Please DO NOT try to update these pages, or start a new day yourself, as it will confuse the LDBot, a bot that maintains the AfD pages. (Note: These pages are not the deletion log pages referred to in step III of the instructions, above).

Purge server cache for today's AFD page

See also Guide to deletion | Alternative outlets | Undeletion policy | Deletion guidelines for admins | Deletion process
Deletion review | AfD Precedents | Archived delete debates | Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
Speedy deletion policy | Policy consensus discussions | Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions |