Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1 St. Clair Avenue East

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete - Izehar 16:11, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 1 St. Clair Avenue East, 2 St. Clair Avenue East, 1 St. Clair Avenue West and 2 St. Clair Avenue West

One line stubs about non-notable apartment buildings in Ontario, Canada. How exciting. Not useful, and unlikley to expand further. Harro5 21:21, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. I have been thinking the same thing. --YUL89YYZ 21:32, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all as NN buildingcruft. I know the intersection, and the buildings truly are NN, and ugly to boot. Most buildings in Toronto that have pretensions of notability have at least a chessy name rather than just an address. Jamie ^{(talk/contribs)} 23:05, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all, per nom Tom Harrison ^(talk) 23:06, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all. The anon who created these has long been noted among some of the Canadian contingent for his problematic edit history and his almost pathological inability to discern the difference between existence and notability. Bearcat 00:01, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all. What Bearcat said. It's possible that there might be something noteworthy about these office buildings (perhaps noted for their particularly appalling brutalist architecture), but there is nothing in the articles to suggest that is the case. Skeezix1000 00:17, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or else add separate articles for all apartment buildings everywhere. •DanMS 01:15, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. -- JJay 02:38, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. - FrancisTyers 02:42, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm pretty strongly in favour of having many articles on buildings, but for these ones there seems to be virtually nothing interesting to say about them. - SimonP 21:11, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.