Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/120k

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 01:16, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 120k

Not encyclopedic. And far, far too long. Probably a copyvio from a publication. — P Ingerson (talk) 22:01, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Massive unwikified spamvertisement. Unfortunately, obvious spam like this is not speediable. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 23:40, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
• Let's self-help ourselves to a better future by deleting this article. humblefool® 23:49, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• An unrivalled opportunity! You can improve your Wikipedia within minutes, in your spare time and from the comfort of your own home! No advance payment required! Just click here. Uncle G 00:59, 2005 Jun 21 (UTC)
• Delete ad. Pity Google doesn't seem to find a copyvio or we could mute it in the meantime. -Splash 01:26, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, and in the meantime I am going to be bold and edit out the contact information as inappropriate content. DS1953 02:34, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not at all encyclopedic content, also badly written, I couldn't even stand to read it long enough to find if there was any material worth salvaging. Peter Grey 02:38, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete advertising. JamesBurns 06:55, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.