Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ਵਲਕਿਕ ਲੁਤ
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:12, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] ਵਲਕਿਕ ਲੁਤ
Left untranslated after two weeks. Discussion from WP:PNT follows:
The language of this article is unknown. --Nationalparks 05:29, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
- It is Punjabi. Kirbytime 09:00, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. This isn't the Punjabi Wikipedia. Aplomado - UTC 05:25, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Delete unless someone can verify the accuracy of this article. -- ReyBrujo 05:39, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Delete normally I would suggest trans-wikification but there doesn't seem to be a Punjabi Wikipedia here [1].ĶĩřβȳŤįɱéØ 05:46, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Looking at the user's contributions page, maybe it's a translation of the user's data mining article?
- Delete unless the article gets translated, and soon. I'm assuming Punjabi Wikipedia doesn't have a working Transwiki system yet. TheProject 07:01, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I created the article here, and we can leave it to them to worry about it. If it gets notable enough, they can bring it back. And no, I don't feel bad about dumping the problem onto them ;) --ĶĩřβȳŤįɱéØ 07:20, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Please don't do that to a small project unless you know the content is good. It might just be garbage and wasting their time too. I've asked a Panjabi speaker to check it out and see if it is worth translating, hopefully he can get to it before this vote is over. Or people could try contacting a couple others. - Taxman Talk 03:18, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. This clearly shouldn't be on the English wikipedia. DarthVader 09:36, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per all of the above. It's been moved to the correct wiki, and can be dealt with by them. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 09:54, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete. An article that's very obviously in the wrong place. Zaxem 10:25, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. I suspect it is a translation of a copyvio article DATA MINING 1 and therefore itself a copyvio. --LambiamTalk 10:49, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, if it's been untranslated for so long it probably won't for a while. If it's notable enough, somebody will eventually create it in English, anyway. -- Voretus the Benevolent 10:58, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, move it to another Wikipedia. --Terence Ong 11:04, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per Terence —Mets501talk 12:45, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. There are no wikilinks in this article and no sources cited, so we shouldn't assume the Punjabi Wikipedia would be interested in this. If Americans started writing low-quality English-language articles in the Punjabi Wikipedia, I wouldn't want the Punjabi editors to transwiki them to the English Wikipedia. --Metropolitan90 17:20, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Move to Punjabi Wikipedia (is there one?). Buchanan-Hermit™..SCREAM!!!.... 00:02, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- Absolutely 100% Delete! This is something no anglophone can understand what it means. Georgia guy 00:03, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Shouldn't be in the English version of Wikipedia without translation. Ted 01:55, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I can read and write Punjabi and this text does not make any sense. It is just garbage.--Tejinder Soodan 05:22, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Tejinder Soodan. ~Kylu (u|t) 05:36, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I'm also a Punjabi reader but cannot make sense of this article. Sorry for replying a little late, but it should be deleted. Gsingh 15:38, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I'm an administrator on the Punjabi Wikipedia and I concur with the two comments above - it makes absolutely no sense. And on a side note, if either of you guys wish to contribute to the Punjabi Wikipedia, please, please do! Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 11:15, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.