Talk:Arthropod leg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve and expand Wikipedia's coverage of arthropods. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

Contents

[edit] Table of possible arthropod leg homologies

Hypothetical
ancestor
Ancestral
hexapod
Insects Spiders Crustaceans Millipede Limulus Scorpions Collembola
 ? epicoxa  ?  ?  ?  ?  ?  ? epicoxa
precoxa subcoxa  ?  ? precoxa  ?  ?  ? subcoxa
coxa coxa coxa coxa coxa coxa coxa coxa coxa
trochanter trochanter trochanter trochanter basis trochanter trochanter trochanter trochanter
prefemur prefemur - - ischium prefemur - - -
femur femur femur femur merus femur femur femur femur
patella patella - patella - - patella patella -
tibia tibia tibia tibia carpus tibia tibia tibia tibia
 ? basitarsus - metatarsus - - - basitarsus
=metatarsus
foot-complex
tarsus eutarsus tarsus tarsus propodus tarsus tarsus telotarsus
=tarsus
pretarsus post-tarsus  ?  ? dactylus claw - pretarsus

[edit] Sources

[edit] Discussion

[edit] Queries

  • Are these homologies correct?
  • Is the precoxa present in other groups?
  • Must the ancestor have had an additional metatarsus?
  • Are the insect tarsomeres homologous with whole leg segments (e.g crustacean dactylus)?

[edit] Further mergers

I realised today that we've got separate articles for biramous and uniramous. Sihce these terms are only meaningful in discussions of arthropod legs, I suggest that their material be brought here as an extra section. I don't know of any good pictures showing a biramous leg, but one would be useful. --Stemonitis 14:06, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Oppose merger of articles re: segments of insect leg

I opposed these mergers on the respective articles talk pages. I have reverted them all. Squamate 14:29, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

To answer your concerns, a merger need not result in a loss of references - these could easily be brought over to arthropod leg. Nor would there necessarily be any dilution of information, since insects have their own section in that article. The separate articles are stubs and are unlikely to grow into anything much longer. They would however, fit perfectly into the arthropod leg article. I can see little reason for preserving their separateness. --Stemonitis 07:32, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
I agree, they would fit very nicely in this article. IronChris | (talk) 14:15, 15 August 2006 (UTC)