Argument principle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The contour C (black), the zeros of f (blue) and the poles of f (red).

In complex analysis, the Argument principle (or Cauchy's argument principle) states that if f(z) is a meromorphic function inside and on some closed contour C, with f having no zeros or poles on C, then the following formula holds

$\oint_{C} {f'(z) \over f(z)}\, dz=2\pi i (N-P)$

where N and P denote respectively the number of zeros and poles of f(z) inside the contour C, with each zero and pole counted as many times as its multiplicity and order respectively. This theorem assumes that the contour C is simple, that is, without self-intersections, and that it is oriented counter-clockwise.

[edit] Proof

Let z_N be a zero of f. We can write f(z) = (z − z_N)^kg(z) where k is the multiplicity of the zero, and thus g(z_N) ≠ 0. We get

$f'(z)=k(z-z_N)^{k-1}g(z)+(z-z_N)^kg'(z)\,\!$

and

${f'(z)\over f(z)}={k \over z-z_N}+{g'(z)\over g(z)}.$

Since g(z_N) ≠ 0, it follows that g′(z)/g(z) has no singularities at z_N, and thus is analytic at z_N, which implies that the residue of f′(z)/f(z) at z_N is k.

Let z_P be a pole of f. We can write f(z) = (z − z_P)^−mh(z) where m is the order of the pole, and thus h(z_P) ≠ 0. Then,

$f'(z)=-m(z-z_P)^{-m-1}h(z)+(z-z_P)^{-m}h'(z)\,\!.$

and

${f'(z)\over f(z)}={-m \over z-z_P}+{h'(z)\over h(z)}$

similarly as above. It follows that h′(z)/h(z) has no singularities at z_P since h(z_P) ≠ 0 and thus it is analytic at z_P. We find that the residue of f′(z)/f(z) at z_P is −m.

Putting these together, each zero z_N of multiplicity k of f creates a simple pole for f′(z)/f(z) with the residue being k, and each pole z_P of order m of f creates a simple pole for f′(z)/f(z) with the residue being −m. (Here, by a simple pole we mean a pole of order one.) In addition, it can be shown that f′(z)/f(z) has no other poles, and so no other residues.

By the residue theorem we have that the integral about C is the product of 2πi and the sum of the residues. Together, the sum of the ks for each zero z_N is the number of zeros counting multiplicities of the zeros, and likewise for the poles, and so we have our result. $\square$

[edit] Consequences

This has consequences in considering the winding number of f(z) about the origin, say, if C is a closed contour centered on the origin. We see that the integral of f′(z)/f(z) about C is the change in values of log f(z). Since C is closed we only need consider the change in i arg f(z) over C − which will be some multiple of 2πi since C is closed (but may wind more than once about the origin). But since by the argument principle