User talk:Andy.we

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello, Andy.we, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

OK, I will welcome myself. Nice to be here! -- Andy.we 20:45, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Interesting Links

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Molecular_and_Cellular_Biology
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Clinical_medicine
Wikipedia:Peer_review


[edit] Paid Editing Project

Hi: My name is Tess and I work for a global independent research firm in New York. I am interested in hiring you for a Wikipedia editing project, based on your technology and medical experience and expertise. I attempted to email you through your user page. If you received it, please read it over and contact me with any questions. If you did not receive this email, please let me know and I would be more than happy to tell you more about this project. (You can call 512-651-1797 or email tfurman@glgroup.com). Thank you and I hope to hear from you soon! Tess - Gerson Lehrman Group 18:44, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Translation

Your article Neurofibromatosis type II looks very good (other than minor typos etc.), I would be happy to look through your translations and fix ant problems. Let me know if you want any other articles checked, danke! Martin 22:00, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Electroconvulsive therapy

Recently an Anon user started adding negative sounding POV about Electroconvulsive therapy which were repeatedly deleted by several users as being POV and for not giving full references (just a name & date). Being a new user, the Anon was unaware of various WP rules or how to see page's history or talk pages and was temporarily blocked after x6 reverts, I'm happy to assume good faith and don't bite the newcomers. However the issue which remains is that a huge number of references were given (Anon's last edit did mostly give full references) that are difficult for non-specialists to assess. DocJohnny has just spent a huge amount of time writing an analysis of the source and type of each reference that was given. I agree with DocJonny's comment that "Anon has a good point regarding one thing. The original article was poorly cited, rife with name/date citations"

Seeing that you are listed on the WikiProject page as being a Psychiatrist, could you help us assess these references and which are useful: here. David Ruben Talk 03:13, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Hallo David!
I just searched some of the articles. It was obviosly no meaningfull order in this collection of papers. Perhaps he or she did a search with "fatality in ECT" and looked for the oldesd articles of the authors (Gralnick 1944, Jeter 1944, Meyer 1945, Sprague 1948) and collected it randomly. It ist not possible to decide wether this papers are worth to read and to cite them, because Pubmed only lists papers until 1950, and so you will not find easyly an abstract. Do you believe the ip did read this papers? There also mistakes: it is not WW Jeter but WW Jetter. I think that the ip must have manipulated the citations, because the whole text looks as ift is not manualy produced but copied. I wonder wether it is worth to do all the work. Greetings Andy.we (sorry i have forgotten my password.) -- 62.180.225.190 17:26, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Psychology Wiki

The Logo for the Psychology Wiki.
Enlarge
The Logo for the Psychology Wiki.

Guten Tag Andy,

I noticed that you are a Doctor working in a psychiatric institution, and thought you might be interested in this project which I am involved in, The Psychology Wiki.

I won't say too much, as I'd like you to judge it for yourself, but you should find that it is different from Wikipedia, because approximately 90% of our contributors so far are psychologists, academics, or students and trainees.

Its hosted by a company called Wikia, which was founded by Jimmy Wales and Angela Beesley. There are Google Ads on the site, but we dont make money from the project, they're just to pay for the bandwidth, storage and technical support that Wikia give us.

Have a look and see what you think

Mostly Zen 01:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

PS We are thinking of translating much of our project in the future. Perhaps you could be useful in this way? Even if you just give us some advice or criticism on how well you think we are doing, that would be great :)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../a/n/d/User_talk%7EAndy.we_15f9.html"