Talk:Amtrak Cascades

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

[edit] Station Stops and schedule

I'd like to come up with a table of station stops and scheduling that indicates how a trainset travels throughout the day - the current list of train numbers isn't very readable. I'm looking for something similar to work from, but having little luck. If someone else has any ideas as to how to do this, please discuss them here.

When Station Stops get an overhaul, I plan to place it nearer to the top again.

Uh, that's a bit too much info. There's no point in having the exact times; it will be less up-to-date than the official site. --SPUI (talk) 10:38, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

The official site only shows this information via PDF (which many users can't view, especially from public computers), and it's updated once a year. The schedule I've made will be valid until July of 2006. The current paragraph on station stops is confusing and poorly written.Bensch 14:49, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

While this much is true, it would be a bit much to include here for several reasons: first, to be of equal use to everyone someone would have to do this for every route on the system; second, the times do periodically change in mid-season (twice a year, not annually, by the way); third, the format may likewise not be readable on all computers (though I don't consider that a serious concern here); and fourth, if someone's using a public computer without Adobe Acrobat Reader installed they can still get the full published schedule sent in the mail for free (not to mention that we should wonder why anyone would put up a public-access computer without Acrobat Reader).BobGreenwade 16:25, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Okay, I'll just come up with a better paragraph then. Bob, SPUI, any comments on what I've done so far (criticism appreciated, this is the first time I've done any major article edits)? What would you like to see next? I'd like to do a history of the route from 1993 on, but I'm not sure where to put it - if it got its own section, I can see quite a bit of duplication being likely, but it doesn't seem to fit either in the base article or in the partnership section. Any advice? --Bensch 16:39, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

The Point Defiance Bypass and Vancouver Rail Project maps are from the Washington State Department of Transportation, a public agency, and can be used. Please note the discussion comments in the Pt. Defiance Bypass image page.--Bensch 23:29, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

From: http://wsdot.wa.gov/privacy.htm: All of the information collected at this site becomes public records that may be subject to inspection and copying by members of the public, unless an exemption in law exists. The provisions of RCW 42.17. 260(1) state that: "Each agency, in accordance with published rules, shall make available for public inspection and copying all public records, unless the record falls within the specific exemptions of subsection (6) of this section [RCW 42.17.260(6)], RCW 42.17.310, 42.17.315, or other statute which exempts or prohibits disclosure of specific information or records. To the extent required to prevent an unreasonable invasion of personal privacy interests protected by RCW 42.17.310 and 42.17.315, an agency shall delete identifying details in a manner consistent with RCW 42.17.310 and 42.17.315 when it makes available or publishes any public record; however, in each case, the justification for the deletion shall be explained fully in writing." --Bensch 23:46, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Public record is a completely separate thing from public domain (copyright). The site says "Copyright WSDOT © 2005" at the bottom. Unless it is released under a suitable license that allows commercial use we cannot use it. --SPUI (talk) 23:47, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Interesting. I've contacted the WSDOT Ombudsman's office. I will get specific permission, how would I indicate that here? --Bensch 23:54, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Specific permission is not enough. Wikipedia is meant for wide distribution in many forms. --SPUI (talk) 00:04, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

Okay, I've reverted to the version with your image. I'll talk to the WSDOT about releasing their page contents into the public domain (or find case law if such exists), and I'll be more careful about that in the future. By the way, that's a great image you made - how'd you do it? --Bensch 00:07, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

Inkscape is good for making SVGs (though I actually used Macromedia Freehand, then converted to SVG in Adobe Illustrator, then did final editing in Inkscape; I don't know the details of embedding Images in Inkscape). As for the base map, that's from TerraServer-USA. --SPUI (talk) 00:36, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

Actually, I was more curious about where you got the alignment. I'm still waiting on information requests from both WSDOT and Sound Transit on exactly where the connection between the Lakeview subdivision and the Freighthouse Square alignment will be. --Bensch 00:53, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

I do question whether specific permission is not enough. It looks like there's precedent of that here.