User talk:Amish Gramish
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Article submitted is a candidate for Speedy Deletion: Amish Gramish
A tag has been placed on Amish Gramish, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Amish Gramish is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Amish Gramish. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. --Casper2k3 02:21, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] playstation 3 oblivion
your "citation" undoubtedly does not fall into WP:RS. 1up is not a reliable source. Gamespot is a bit better, but a far cry from an official word. In the Oblivion forums Bethesda denied it. You need to talk about such speculative material in the talk pages before you edit. --gatoatigrado 01:07, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] ps3 oblivion
"I new [sic?] they would announce it, and you gatoatigrado, have just been an annoyance". that's nice. If you find verifiability and reliable sources annoying, and believe all unconfirmed rumors to be true, perhaps you should go to another website. I have no problem with the facts as they stand now. --gatoatigrado 05:04, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- "And by the way, The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion is the cover of the November issue of the Official PlayStation Magazine" [1] - read my previous reply; at the time it wasn't. I said it's okay. Here's a more official link, by the way. [2].
- Did you really listen to the audiocast? The time is 1:15:50 (the media doesn't have clearly define start positions, so you can't skip exactly to the right position), not 1:14 to 1:15 as you said [3]. I doubt anyone on Wikipedia would want to listen to an 86 minute audio file (which requires a 30 megabyte download) searching for the word "Oblivion". Did you hear how they introduced the talk - "we've got some stuff from 'the' message boards" - doesn't sound very official to me. They were chatting with someone from New York over skype talking about what was popular with gamers. Also doesn't sound very official. You're right, the real words sound convincing - "We're getting so close to the ps3...they haven't shown the ps3 version, which is apparently a launch title...", if you brought it up - which would require you actually listening to it - I would have been more than accepting, and I certainly don't mean to assume bad faith. Needless to say, I admitted I was wrong when the official announcement was made. I made - well, maybe a non-apology apology - when you talked about it - and I am sorry if you were offended by my negative reaction to the podcast; it wasn't personal. You, on the other hand, are making childish ad hominem remarks, which I don't appreciate.
- No other sources made the same claim. ps3land (a GameSpot "union" member) said "we're holding our breath". Kotaku said it was a "rumor". Also, as you can read (how convenient) on gamasutra 2006-09-28 [4] "Up until this confirmation, Bethesda has adamantly denied that the game was in development for either platform.".
-
-
- Please read WP:NPA. You could get banned for it. "I didn't think there were any people who were that ignorant to not know about how Ziff Davis and all the video game magazines and the website that it owns" - you obviously have a big ego (see your user page, and your request for your own wikipedia article). "Saying what you said about those audiocasts was like saying that all blogs are crap" - I did not say they were "crap", I said they were unofficial. There is no way the time could be 1:14, if it started at 1:15:50. --gatoatigrado 03:41, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- "I am a musician and I make AMVs" - right, sorry. I actually have a friend who did the same thing.... Yes, I have edited the playstation 3 page a lot, but most things I do are minor grammatical corrections and vandalism reverts – and there were quite a few over-hyped edits to the games list. Generally you are right; reliable sources include good news sources, not only direct company statements. In any case I am tired of arguing; thank you for apologizing and if it wasn't clear before, I am sorry if I offended you. --gatoatigrado 07:19, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
[edit] not quite sure what you're saying
um, in your edits for Playstation_3#PlayStation_Portable_Connectivity, is Sony merely polling gamers for options they would like? Are these actually confirmed features? I saw your ref for playing psp games on the ps3 - that's neat. The quote below, however, should be revised. You don't have to reply on my talk page, just please rewrite the section into the clean, concise prose the rest of the article is in. (maybe move it to the operating system section as well? or a separate subtitle for software? it doesn't make sense where it is) --gatoatigrado 02:57, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] ps3 estimated costs
good catch with the hardware differences for the analyst estimates, but on the article it doesn't say "if they were manufactured in January 2006", it says estimated at launch. --24.7.86.143 01:54, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
