User talk:Americasroof

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello, Americasroof, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 15:54, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] LIRR dates

Yes, Americasroof, I am quite sure of the LIRR dates. The State acquired the capital stock in 1966 and handed over operation to the newly formed MCTA in 1968. By the time of the disastrous Penn Central merger, the LIRR was already gone from the PRR balance sheet. -- Cecropia 06:01, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I thought you were probably right but the article wasn't clear. Thanks again (and for the help on talk!!! Americasroof 11:11, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Truman

Keep up the good work on Harry S. Truman National Historic Site! Nationalparks 03:22, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vietnam Veterans Memorial

Thank you for your contributions, but I have have a couple of comments.

You have turned the history section from prose into a bullet-point list. It is generally considered better style for an encyclopedia article to be in prose, rather than a list of bullet points. Please would you think about turning it back into prose (adding in your additions, of course).

You may also have noticed the "preview" button, which you can use to check an edit before you save it. Although you can edit an article half a dozen times in a row, doing so it makes it more difficult to follow the edit history. -- ALoan (Talk) 16:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your repsonse. I agree that a timeline can be helpful (there is a nifty graphical way to produce them - see John Vanbrugh, Isambard Kingdom Brunel and List of popes (graphical) for examples) but I think the timeline should accompany the prose, not replace it.
I was just pointing it out the "preview" function in case you hadn't noticed it. I often edit the same article more than once, but I try not to do it half a dozen times, where I can help it (but don't look at the edit history for Test cricket hat-tricks or List of Test cricket triple centuries!). -- ALoan (Talk) 14:39, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Catskills as a Robert Moses project?

I don't think that category makes sense. While Moses acquired some of the better land in the Catskill Park (and I really should appropriately rename that article and Adirondack State Park since both are officially just known as parks and they aren't state parks in the same way that all of the other state parks are), it was created before he was born.

BTW, are you the same guy whose name I know from other hiking-related fora who runs the americasroof.com site? Daniel Case 16:28, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Robert Moses and New York State Parks

I can find no evidence supporting your addition of Category:Robert Moses Projects to Harriman State Park and Bear Mountain State Park, and I suspect several other parks outside of the NYC area. Would you care to cite a source? Thanks, -- Mwanner | Talk 13:56, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

You wrote: "Robert Moses was originally the New York STATE Parks Commissioner...". Harriman and Bear Mountain were built under the Palisades Interstate Park Commission in the 1910s. But "...the state park system was consolidated under Robert Moses in 1924..." [1]. I am going to remove the Moses category from those two parks, and I urge you to check the accuracy of assigning the other upstate parks to his agency. -- Mwanner | Talk 15:51, 10 May 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Lirr-map.gif

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lirr-map.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 15:13, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Since the image in the source page http://www.mta.nyc.ny.us/lirr/html/lirrmap.htm is not part of a press kit or a promotional page, it seems that it is not available under the license You are using. I'd suggest removing the image and drawing it Yourself. Currently the image is not proper. To remove it place {{db-author}} in the images page. Questions? NB put ~~~~ to the end of Your talk to sign it, best feydey 16:27, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags has all the tags available for image uploading, and US Federal government images are the only ones in Public Domain. Remember to put {{db-author}} in the images page. Cheers feydey 16:43, 21 May 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Mta-routes.gif

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mta-routes.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 17:09, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] MTA images

I notice You have copied several images possibly from MTA's page? Please check the sources and remove them if needed per previous discussion. Thanks. feydey 17:12, 21 May 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Mta-amtrak.gif

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mta-amtrak.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 17:12, 21 May 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Mta four.jpg

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mta four.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 12:35, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Mta two.jpg

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mta two.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 12:37, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Mta-sunnyside.jpg

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mta-sunnyside.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 12:37, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Mta-profile.jpg

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mta-profile.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 12:38, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Gct-tower.gif

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Gct-tower.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 12:39, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Gct-pei.gif

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Gct-pei.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 12:40, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Mta-routes.gif

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mta-routes.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 13:30, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedi CD

I don't see how this effort is an effort to privatize the material. Rather it is an attempt to spread knowledge in keeping with the general goals of the Wikimedia Foundation. It is an important part of the Wikipedia:One Encyclopedia Per Child (position paper) which is an outgrouth of the One Laptop Per Child - I hope you reconsider Trödel 14:18, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Danforth-book.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Danforth-book.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:05, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nodaway etymology

Thanks for the good information on Nodaway. --Marcusscotus1 00:12, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Catholic Orders

Why are you messing up these things without telling anybody or discussing it first? It's really rude. Williamb 04:34, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jazz

Thanks for your edits to Jazz. Your last edit is grammatically unclear, though. I didn't fix it since I wasn't sure of its intended meaning. Special-T 12:39, 3 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] UDC/Empire State Dev Corp

I disagree with your editorial decisions on this article. See its discussion page.Chelydra 11:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Missouri in the Civil War

You have recently been working on an impressive menu for Missouri Civil War battles. If you have time, you may want to create a separate article such as Ohio in the Civil War or Pennsylvania in the Civil War covering Missouri. There are also attached categories for these states that you may want to copy for Missouri topics such as people, places, events, monuments, etc. (see Category:Ohio in the Civil War). Regards, and keep up the good work! Scott Mingus 18:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Scott! Those are great suggestions! Americasroof 19:02, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Are you...

The guy from americasroof.com? 1ne 22:15, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] link to kansas city

Hello, when you want to link to the article about Kansas City, please do not link to Kansas City, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the one of the options found on that page such as Kansas City, Missouri by writing out [[Kansas City, Missouri|Kansas City]]. Regards, Jeff3000 22:42, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Battle of Saratoga

Points well taken. I didn't see any explanation of the deletion in your edit summaries, and you were making enough changes that I thought you might have lost that graf in the process. Damn! I just realised that I just reverted a minor change that should stay. Anyway... cheers! -- Mwanner | Talk 23:24, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Civil War articles

I'm sitting in a hotel in southern Ohio as I type this. I've been filling out Category:Kansas in the Civil War tonight, as well as Category:Missouri in the Civil War for those biographies and places not covered in your excellent template. Keep up the good work, and please join the Civil War Task Force! We'd love to have you on board. Scott Mingus 01:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Red Crown Tavern

thanks for adding to the article. Great info. Kaltenborn

[edit] Idiot

Blanche Barrow was not hit in the face with glass at Dexfield Park. Where did you get this bullshit?

The above was posted anonymously and unsigned by User talk:152.163.100.12

[edit] DYK

Updated DYK query On 1 October 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bearcat Stadium, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Hello, great job on Bearcat Stadium. Thanks for the good work. I thought you might like to know about Wikipedia:WikiProject_College_football. I added our Project template to the new article's Talk page. Best, Johntex\talk 03:37, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Awesome! I had no idea DKR had been a president of that association until I saw you add it today. I tagged the new list with the college football template. We also have a Portal:College football which you are more than welcome to contribute to. Johntex\talk 03:49, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Featured article

Great job on the Bearcat Stadium article it has received front page recognition. That is great exposure for it. It is a good article. Thank you. BCV 16:26, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Truman Annex

Thanks for the thanks!  :)

I've been working on the list of National Register places in Florida, and got to Monroe County. Don't know the specifics of ownership of the Truman Annex. I put down the National Park Service as governing body only b/c they administer the entire National Register of Historic Places. So, technically correct, but incomplete. My goal is to at least create minimal stubs for all the historic Florida places, and those who know more hopefully can modify and expand.

Dunno much about the Keys, as such. Grew up in Miami, live in Ocala now, and have done a lot of road-tripping around the state. The Keys are on the list to explore more, but not for a while.

I'd recommend these two for more specific Keys info, they seem to be the experts:

Hope this helps! --Ebyabe 17:19, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Boot Monument

Thanks for the source about Benedict Arnold, the antecdote seemed too convienent to be true. If I believed in giving out barnstars, you would get one. Electrawn 14:46, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

As much as I would like to think H&SJ made it to California, it never left the state of Missouri (the only possible reason I can think that it would pop into the California Metsbot was that it carried mail EAST from St. Joseph from the Pony Express. If you think that's strong enough criteria, you can put it back. Otherwise, I've deleted it. Americasroof 00:40, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, that was another weird category thing. I've removed the template from the other pages in that category. —Mets501 (talk) 00:46, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Spoofhound

I'm sorry, but I simply don't believe that this merits an article separate from that of the high school. Joyous! | Talk 02:21, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind note. Joyous! | Talk 03:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I never cease to be amazed at the malicious vindictiveness here

Hello. You said, I never cease to be amazed at the malicious vindictiveness here. As it would appear that this statement was made in relation to my actions, I would like to respond. The fact is that the overwhelming majority of these school articles cannot meet our verifability policy, nor can they provide reliable sources. Yet, if nominated for deletion, as would be proper, uncited and unsourced support will spring fully-formed from the sea, regardless of whether or not we might have policies and guidelines which might be relevant, and both policy and precedent will be ignored by people who somehow feel validated by having their high school represented on Wikipedia, regardless of whether or not it properly belongs here under our policies and guidelines. Thus, those of us who truly believe in the importance of constructing a legitimate encyclopedia are left but to vandalise. And so we shall. 87.98.217.163 04:50, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] John Vernou Bouvier III

It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Attacking another user back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors and leads to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks! --cholmes75 (chit chat) 17:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

You should probably reread the comments on John Vernou Bouvier III. They were directed at a process where one editor can unilaterally nuke a article which I think is wrong. At least with the afd process other eyes can evaluate. Americasroof 19:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Kansas City

This is to let you know that, pursuant to the discussion on Talk:Kansas City, Missouri in recent months, we've gone ahead and started it. Feel free to join in and help out! -- nae'blis 20:16, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Subject line is a connecting link, but here you go: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Kansas_City
I think a photo request section is a fantastic idea... -- nae'blis 05:24, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../a/m/e/User_talk%7EAmericasroof_b00e.html"