Talk:AMD K10
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on August 29, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
How about adding a section for rumors concerning K10? =(
Contents |
[edit] I doubt about the report from The Inquirer
The Inquirer was famed to report misleading information in the industry. Many have proven that. Why delete the original introduction, according to the information that The Inquirer reported? I think that paragraph should be kept.
- EDIT*: PLUS the article in the Inquirer was dated "Thursday 03 November 2005, 07:20". The article reported that the K10 was dead OR delayed, it was just mere speculation, and does not reflect the true status of the project in AMD. What we know is that K8L will be released between 1Q07-2Q08 (from the article), which will surely be staying in the market for a while (at least 18 months), but it doesn't mean that the K10 was dead, as K10's not even confirmed as K9.
- EDIT 2*: reference to the Inquirer: Wiki Article about the site
202.71.240.18 10:06, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- The Inq is an interesting site for rumors, and they're occasionally correct. But rewriting an article around something they claim is extremely unwise. They are principally a rumor site, not a news site. Everything I've heard out of AMD leads me to believe K10 is going forward, and K9 is not. It's plausible K10 has been cancelled, and that kind of rumor is worthy of being briefly noted. Aluvus 12:22, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Something interesting...
TechReport: AMD outlines future technology directions. What will they make at that shiny new fab?
Something interesting on the ppt slide... "Future goals", should it be added to this article?
[edit] For the sentence below, I shall nominate this article for AfD.
According to this edit (revision ID: 71706208) from user Timharwoodx: "This would tend to confirm the claim that the original complex 8-issue K9 and K10 chip have been cancelled, and replaced with a multicore IPC enhanced Athlon 64 derivative."
With cited source from The Inquirer.
K10 are reported cancelled in the source, and now I'm convinced that K9 and K10 does not even exist at all. Thus this article and K9 (Yes, both articles) should be nominated for AfD, and redirected to AMD/K8L (Depends on the final discussion results).
I think that Timharwoodx should start writing an article about "a multicore IPC enhanced Athlon 64 derivative" though.
Anyone who wanted to prevent this page from deleted, should give users (at least me) proof of existence of the project (I don't care the type of the proof, or the codename of the project, just an official proof from AMD, not news reports and interviews from The Inquirer, DigiTimes, or any kind of "Tech Tabloid".). If no proof(s) given, then I'll go nominate this for AfD for the reason of "Non-existence" product based on speculations.
BTW, as K10 doesn't exist at all, I removed the future product tag. --202.71.240.18.
[edit] Article Cleanup Co-Ordination Point
| Cleanup Co-ordination | |
|---|---|
 |
This article has recently been tagged as requiring cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The article may have been flagged as needing cleanup because it has been suggested that:
For a full list of possible problems see Wikipedia:Manual of Style. As part of the cleanup process, the automated bot PocKleanBot has generated this notice as a focus of cleanup efforts, and also contacted several contributing editors of the article to bring their attention to the problem. You should use this section to discuss possible resolution of the problem and achieve consensus for action. Only when there is a consensus that the article is now cleaned up should you then de-list it by deleting the cleanup tag from the article, this causes the article to drop off the monthly cleanup-needed list page. |
[edit] Discussion |
|
